Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time table of the ICC cricket world cup
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 15:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- All-time table of the ICC cricket world cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Serves no purpose as it duplicates already covered information. Greenbörg (talk) 17:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The first table seems to be a poor copy/reworking of the table in the main article and this list is littered with unsourced WP:OR. Who gives 2 points for a win, for example? I see no such historical list/calculations from the ICC. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - there are so many things wrong with this that it's a clear delete. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete pure OR, stops in 1996 for some reason. Spike 'em (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:NOTSTATS and WP:NOR are the main issues. Jack | talk page 19:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOR and WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per the above comments, it's OR that fails WP:NOTSTATS. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as the article contains malicious duplicate copy and has several mistakes in my point of view. Abishe (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.